Retort Oldsalt:
1. I read from the globe, CBC, Economist, Newyork times and few French papers and few for articles eastern Eroupe. There is a socialist democratic slant to my grasing but remember I have been reading from a very young age. Generaly learned how to filter out the right wing Conrad Black, Rupert Murdoc BS...
2.Yes a lot of Americans died for oil. And some figueres say as many as 10 times that died as a result of the conflict.
Clean surgical warefare.
Highway of death - YouTube
Can you give me a more clear example of a country where the USA has used as much military might to fight a war or stay as long that does not have oil reserves?
Why not pick a fight with North Korea ( besides probably being a bit tougher foe than Iraq ) a nation that obvioulsy a greater threat to world peace.
I am not saying you are bad guys, just you had an agenda!
And the justification for GW2 the weapons of mass deception have still never been found.
3. The majority of Americans did not decided it was no longer worth it. You got me there I did not ask all 300 million of you...
But you are broke and can't finance wars on two fronts bombing 4 or more countries at once.
Some Americans, the exact figueres I can't quote may have also lost their taste for it.
Conclusion war is not costs effective 4 trillion dollars for what results achieved and how does this enhance us security and interests if not for oil?
Do I care what happens to the USA.
YOUR DAM RIGHT!
I want to see a peacful properous USA.
Because the alternative of an unstable bankrupt former superpower scares the crap out of me.
But with a little effort spent looking after interests at home where your country has a chance to fix things that are in its best interest will result in my friendly neighbor to the south returning to its pre 911 poster and common sence.
And Osama is DEAD, only cost what 4 trillion? and the accidental invasion of a country not even remotely involved to achieve it.