answers in order, They didn't, apparently someone at Tecumseh deemed the thin thrust washer as the CR retainer fine in this application, just use the LH's and the HSSK's that used them as an example..... In fact look up any HS40, HS50, LH195 or HSSK variation that originally used the now NLA (bcr) 33158 camshaft from Tecumseh and you will see they superseded it to the Plastic version of the late model MCR and thats what you will get. other than being composite camshaft the CR is the same parts and setup the same. Its a shitty option, but thats what they did and currently still do.
I didn't say they used a thicker washer, on the L head, I wont post again my solution to what I feel is too thin of a thrust washer becuase it IS serving as the retainer in both applications again since all you did above was reword what I already said in that post.
Your "easy way" may be easy for you, my easy way is easy for me............as stated before different strokes for different folks
OK, Maybe you should tell that to the designers at Tecumseh that did it as it wasn't my idea to use that camshaft in the late versions and subsequently use it also as the replacement for every HS made since 1971 when the BCR steel cams ran out.