Interested readers,
Scott (smudvapor) had noted that his kids won't actually be to ride "on company time" their completed bikes because of liability issues. Rather than continue the discussion in one of his team's thread, I figured best to move over here.
I have a little bit of experience in this arena. School districts either purchase a liability insurance policy where the insurance company sets the limits (not great) or they self-insure and the finance department set the limits (terrible).
Here's some common examples: transporting students in personal vehicles--nope; transporting students in an 15 passenger van (E250 or similar)--nope; students using "dangerous" shop equipment (and there's one that's not?)--nope.
Students operating/driving a device they built/worked on is where it gets really muddy. In some cases, it might be yes and others no way.
Here's one that caused me huge heartburn (I was ready to stroke). I received a field trip application for a teacher and student to head up to the local fairgrounds....to practice driving a farm tractor....and not just a typical farm tractor but one of them big ones. Turns out the FFA has a tractor driving contest and the student qualified but never had driven a big tractor. I had to approve it. I really didn't want to.
School administrators like to see no risk in activities. No risk means no headaches. I think, though, we educators are too risk averse. Kids gotta feel the excitement. There's nothing like wiping the grease off the palm, grabbing the handle and enjoying your handiwork.
So Scott's got to walk a very fine walk here. I sent a letter to his superintendent last year after the build-off commending Scott. If you find Scott's teacher web site at the school, he's doing everything I looked for: Hands-on, project-based learning with real life application.
Kudos to Scott for doing what's right for kids.:thumbsup:
Scott (smudvapor) had noted that his kids won't actually be to ride "on company time" their completed bikes because of liability issues. Rather than continue the discussion in one of his team's thread, I figured best to move over here.
I have a little bit of experience in this arena. School districts either purchase a liability insurance policy where the insurance company sets the limits (not great) or they self-insure and the finance department set the limits (terrible).
Here's some common examples: transporting students in personal vehicles--nope; transporting students in an 15 passenger van (E250 or similar)--nope; students using "dangerous" shop equipment (and there's one that's not?)--nope.
Students operating/driving a device they built/worked on is where it gets really muddy. In some cases, it might be yes and others no way.
Here's one that caused me huge heartburn (I was ready to stroke). I received a field trip application for a teacher and student to head up to the local fairgrounds....to practice driving a farm tractor....and not just a typical farm tractor but one of them big ones. Turns out the FFA has a tractor driving contest and the student qualified but never had driven a big tractor. I had to approve it. I really didn't want to.
School administrators like to see no risk in activities. No risk means no headaches. I think, though, we educators are too risk averse. Kids gotta feel the excitement. There's nothing like wiping the grease off the palm, grabbing the handle and enjoying your handiwork.
So Scott's got to walk a very fine walk here. I sent a letter to his superintendent last year after the build-off commending Scott. If you find Scott's teacher web site at the school, he's doing everything I looked for: Hands-on, project-based learning with real life application.
Kudos to Scott for doing what's right for kids.:thumbsup: