This is one of the things I question about all the added venting. That's a pretty decent sized opening in the block and head for air and oil to get through. How much air pressure can any container that size produce/hold with that large of an opening, even with the constant "pump" action from the piston? IMO engine venting would work fine out of the rocker cover only. Two hoses and two one way valves for air out only.
You have mentioned your air pressure testing. Have you tested the air pressure at the rocker cover with and without an extra vent from block to rocker cover? If so what did you notice?
Yea. Any other vent without a check valve always showed higher vacuum/ pressures. I added 3 and 4 check valves and didn't notice any decrease, at any rpm. 2 was the magic number. I'm sure older worn engines would be different.
I found the same pressure in the crankcase and the valve cover. In many different engine combos, they was the same pressure/vacuum, With or without check valves.
It didn't matter where I put the port for the gauge.
The biggest difference was the check valves. 1 valve outta the gov rod hole and 1 valve outta the valve cover was the same as 2 out the valve cover. Very little oil outta the rod hole compared to the side cover. But there was jus a tiny bit of mist when 2 valves outta the valve cover.
There was an increase in vacuum/pressure when I had both hoses, with valves going to the catch can. Only 1 to can and other to atmosphere, was a decrease. That kinda thur me off. But that's what the gauge said on different engines. So I figured that was the best I could find.
I left the gauge on mine, jus to show people when they come around asking about crankcase vent.
I take out 1 check valve and pressure goes up. Take out both and pressure went higher.
Even if the gauge was wrong, the bounce in the needle don't lie right???