but isn't it possible to make a wider jackshaft plate and correspondingly spaced tabs on the frame to lower the bearing plate one inch and keep the ability to adjust?
Thanks for the advice Pete, but no, I looked at that. I need significantly more that that for the chain to clear. As it is, there is almost no room between the bearing and the mounting bolts- maybe 1/8". That is all that is available there.
To put it in perspective, I'd need to flip the JS mount upside down and weld it to the bottom of the frame for the chain to clear the exhaust. But that puts the brake hub too low. Conversely, I looked at widening and narrowing the JS welded on mount location, and I run in to bolt accessibility problems.
If I were "real" good, I'd weld bungs in the frame and slot the JS plates to move on them. But even that wouldn't give me the room I need. That Gilson set up would still be way too high, as pictured.
I think the photo of the bike does not illustrate how tiny it is. From the bottom of the frame to the top bar is 13 inches. What is also not detailed, is that I don't have any leeway with that brake hub. I am not going to run brake cable between the spark plug wire, and any lateral placement of it, and it hits either the rear tire, or runs right on the engine. Remember, I need room for the brake band, as well as the pivot/linkage and actuation cable and adjuster.
I can't move the engine further forward because I run out of room for the carburetor/filter.
The chain hits the exhaust when it is looped over the JS as it sits with NO sprocket. I plan on using a 10t, which is why I am estimating the 1".
Or as we say, 10 pounds of crap in a five pound bag. LOL, but this is why I enjoy the hobby. I can completely change everything, and still afford it. Thanks for the comments Pete.